Wind Energy Projects - Jobsite Selection Takes Center Stage
Site selection for wind turbine generation presents one of the
first legal issues to consider in the construction of a wind farm.
It is not surprising that the law addressing site selection for
wind farms is generally more developed than the law regarding the
unique construction aspects of wind farms, such as land use
agreements, equipment contracts, construction contracts, power
supply agreements, and the incorporation of wind farm output into
the power grid.
Historically, rights to a view from property were not
enforceable unless those rights were spelled out in local
subdivision regulations or in covenants, conditions, and
restrictions that bound individual property owners. Views, or
vistas, were regulated, if at all, at the municipal level or even
more locally, by development or residential complex. However, in
recent years, an increasing number of states and localities have
passed laws protecting scenic and historic views, and Wind Turbine
Generator (WTG) sitings are susceptible to challenge under these
laws.
Some plaintiffs have claimed that WTG sitings spoil scenic views
and reduce property values. The U.S. Supreme Court held in 1954
that promotion of the "general welfare" can include
passage of regulations that preserve or enhance aesthetics
(Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954)). The
Berman ruling provided the basis for numerous state and
local laws that prohibit the interruption of scenic views by
housing developments, commercial real estate projects, and in
particular, construction occurring in or near lakes, streams,
wetlands, and coastal areas. State laws or constitutional
provisions in Hawaii, Maine, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Vermont,
and Wisconsin all establish design controls or other regulations to
"conserve and protect scenic beauty." See, e.g.,
New York Mun. Home Rule Law Sec. 10(1)(a)(1) (permitting passage of
local laws to "protect and enhance. . . physical and visual
environments"). See Kevin E. McCarthy,
"Regulating Scenic Views," Connecticut Office of
Legislative Research, No. 2002-R-0653, September 18, 2002., at
-
Even where state legislatures have not enacted laws authorizing
subdivisions to regulate views, local zoning powers often allow
municipalities to do so on their own initiative. Local ordinances
in California, Colorado, Maryland, New York, Oregon, Texas, Utah,
and Wisconsin all restrict development and/or subdivision of land
with an aim toward preserving or enhancing scenic views or
otherwise avoiding construction that...
To continue reading
Request your trial