In its Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 9, 2012, the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in Pinkard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. held that under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), when an individual discloses his or her cellular phone number to a business, that individual is deemed to have expressly consented to receive telephone calls and text messages from that business unless he or she has expressly limited the scope of such consent at the time of the disclosure.The plaintiff in Pinkard alleged that when filling her prescription at one of Wal-Mart's pharmacies, a Wal-Mart employee stated that the plaintiff's phone number was needed "in case there were any questions that came up." The plaintiff provided her mobile telephone number to the employee, after which point the plaintiff began receiving text messages from Wal-Mart (although it is noted that the content of the messages is not known). The plaintiff brought an action against Wal-Mart for violating the TCPA, which "... makes it illegal ... to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice ... to any telephone number assigned to a ... cellular telephone service ..." The Pinkard court adopted the principle that a text message is the equivalent of a telephone call for purposes of the TCPA (which we have blogged about here). In granting...
Take Two of These, And I Will Text You In The Morning (Because It's Permitted Under The TCPA)
|Author:||Mr Kevin Khurana|
|Profession:||Proskauer Rose LLP|
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP