The Texas Supreme Court Rules Trial Courts Must Watch Video Evidence Before Deciding To Exclude; Finds Video Evidence Probative Of 'Soft Damages' In Personal Injury Cases

In Diamond Offshore Services Limited, et al. v. Williams, the Texas Supreme Court analyzed whether the trial court erred in excluding surveillance video without first viewing it. The Court held that, despite the extensive deference given to the discretion of the trial court, "the proper exercise of discretion requires the trial court to actually view video evidence before ruling on its admissibility," and that the trial court committed a harmful error when it excluded the video of plaintiff without viewing it first.

In this case, Williams, an employee of Diamond, was injured while working on a heavy piece of equipment and never returned to work. When he sued Diamond for negligence, the company pursued a defense theory that Williams was overstating his pain and downplaying his ability to return to at least some form of work. Diamond obtained a 30-minute surveillance video showing Williams engaging in physical activities, including operating a mini-excavator, bending over to pick up debris, and working on his truck.

Williams objected to the admissibility of the surveillance video, arguing, among other things, that the video was not a fair representation of his disabilities and was unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403 of the Texas Rules of Evidence. The trial court sustained the objection without viewing the video and disallowed Diamond from introducing it as either impeachment or substantive evidence. The jury awarded Williams nearly $10 million in...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT