Foreign Profits Reforms - Proposals Deferred Beyond 2009
On 21 July 2008, 13 months after launching a consultation on
reforming the United Kingdom's regime for the taxation of
companies' foreign profits, HM Treasury released an
update.
Since HM Treasury launched a consultation on reforming the
United Kingdom's regime for the taxation of companies'
foreign profits 13 months ago, the subject of taxation
generally has become a political hot potato, with the
Government forced rather hurriedly to revise a number of
proposed reforms to the tax system amid a shower of hostile
headlines. The proposed foreign profits reforms provoked a
similar reaction, with several major UK companies deciding to
"migrate" their head offices out of the United
Kingdom by incorporating new ultimate holding companies
resident elsewhere, and others announcing that they were
actively considering taking such steps. The Treasury therefore
issued a technical note on 12 July 2008, partly to provide an
update on the consultation process but also to provide
reassurance to businesses unsettled by the breadth of the
proposals and the uncertainty surrounding the UK tax system
more generally.
The centrepiece of the original discussion document, the
introduction of a tax exemption for foreign dividends, was
widely welcomed by UK corporates. Whilst the current
credit-based system for taxing foreign dividends generates
relatively little revenue for the Treasury, it causes
considerable costs and complexity for UK-parented groups in
structuring their affairs to achieve this result by maximising
credit on foreign dividends. The quid pro quo for the
exemption, however, was a strengthened "controlled
company" (CC) regime to replace the existing controlled
foreign company (CFC) rules. The existing entity-based CFC
regime would be replaced by an income-based regime, which would
subject to tax in the United Kingdom almost all a group's
"passive" income (such as interest, royalties and
rents).
It was this change in approach which caused particular
concerns for UK corporates, particularly for those whose
business and profits in large part involved the exploitation of
intellectual property (IP) overseas, as it had the potential to
tax profits deriving from the exploitation of IP which has very
little UK nexus, that is outside the scope of the existing CFC
rules (including embedded royalties). The proposed reforms
undoubtedly played a large part in the decision of Shire
Pharmaceuticals and United Business Media to establish new
holding companies that...
To continue reading
Request your trial