China Hands Milk Producers The Largest Anti-Monopoly Violation Fine

On August 7, 2013, the National Development and Reform Commission ("NDRC") fined six powdered milk companies – five foreign and one Hong Kong-based – RMB668 million (approximately US$109 million) for engaging in anti-competitive practices and illegal price-fixing, the largest fine ever for an Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML") violation in China.

This historic ruling comes on the heels of a four-month investigation conducted by the antitrust division of the National Development and Reform Commission ("NDRC"). During the investigation, the companies eventually admitted to fixing the prices of powdered milk sold in China. Specifically, per public information, they admitted entering into contracts with distributors to agree to a minimum sales price, practically known as a type of "vertical monopoly." Some companies, like FrieslandCampina, confirmed they fixed prices, but initially believed it was permissible.

The AML was drafted to prevent unfair and anti-competitive pricing practices. Article 14 addresses the practice commonly referred as "resale price maintenance," and forbids a vertical monopoly with anti-competitive effect, such as stipulating a specific or minimum resale price for goods provided to downstream parties like distributors or retailers. This is distinct from the practice of providing a "suggested" retail price, which is a genuine suggested price and not a required price. While there are exemptions from the law, if a company is unsure of whether its agreements may potentially violate the law, it is required to apply to the government for approval.

The fine for an AML violation, assessed at the discretion of the NDRC, may range from 1 to 10 percent of a company's total annual sales revenue. U.S. based Mead Johnson was hit hardest, fined RMB204 million (US$33 million), representing 4 percent of...