Previously published in InsideCounselOngoing litigation around recent acquisitions highlights the difficult disclosure decisions that public companies face, particularly with regard to the duty to update prior public disclosure in mergers and acquisitions. In mergers and acquisitions, the difficult disclosure decision generally relates to new information about the target. When the acquirer files its proxy statement for the deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission, its expectations for the target company are based on information available at the time. The acquirer will share with investors the expected impact the deal will have on earnings and the acquirer as a whole. However, it is not uncommon for new information to surface about the target company, sometimes just days before shareholders are scheduled to vote on the proposed transaction. This changes the acquirer's projections on the impact of the transaction, making the acquirer's earlier statements in the proxy statement inaccurate. So, the acquirer faces a decision on whether or not to update the prior disclosure in its proxy statement. In analyzing whether or not the acquirer should update the disclosure, it should be noted that there are a few cases that support the idea that there is a narrow duty to update prior disclosure when the disclosure involves a company's originally expressed expectations regarding mergers, takeovers or liquidations. This conclusion stems from wording in the cases that suggests disclosure about such extraordinary events contains an implicit representation by the company that it will update the public with news of any significant changes related to the disclosure. So, at a minimum, extra care is merited when making decisions about whether...
Regulatory: Mergers And Acquisitions And The Duty To Update - Projections Often Change Between The Proxy Statement Filing And The Shareholder Vote
|Author:||Mr Peter Fetzer|
|Profession:||Foley & Lardner|
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP