International Corporate Fraud Investigations
INTRODUCTION
With fraud and corruption accounting for more than 2% of the U.S. gross
domestic product, and with it being even more prevalent in many foreign
countries, U.S. corporations which have overseas operations are finding it
increasingly necessary to conduct internal fraud investigations in foreign
countries.
Numerous issues arise in U.S. based fraud investigations, which require the
lawyer conducting them to be knowledgeable in areas of commercial law, white
collar criminal law, parallel proceedings and other areas. When a U.S.
corporation, particularly a major one, begins an investigation in a foreign
country, whether of its own operations or of third parties, the lawyer
conducting the investigation must be cognizant of many factors that would not
arise in the United States and must plan the investigation to deal with these
factors.††This is particularly true where the corporation is a major
employer, or revenue from it is important to the local or national economy, or
if there are local joint venture partners, third party companies or prominent
persons who may be implicated in wrongdoing.
Overseas investigations can arise in a number of different
ways.††The host foreign government may commence an
investigation.††In some instances, the United States government will
commence an investigation of a U.S. corporation for work done overseas. In many
instances, the corporation will itself want to conduct an overseas investigation
because of concerns that it has been defrauded or because of concerns regarding
its operations or relationships with third parties.
Those with the requisite education and business experience to perpetrate
large scale frauds are often schoolmates, business associates or family to those
in government positions of power.††The close personal and business
relationships which exist between government, on the one hand, and wealthy
families and powerful business executives on the other, such as joint-ownership
of target companies, family intermarriages resulting in joint business interests
and even joint legal/professional representation, can cause great difficulty for
the investigation.
Often, as a result of the fact that the "upper echelons" move in
the same social arenas, third parties may be hesitant to provide information
against the subjects of the investigation for fear of retribution specifically
associated with their continued social positions.††Or they may funnel
information to the persons being investigated while appearing to fully
cooperate.††These people frequent the same churches, country clubs and
vacation spots and are firm in their belief that, once the furor passes, they
will again be interacting with the subject(s) of your investigation.††
Yet an investigator may have no clue of the relationship and thus not know that
real assistance will not be forthcoming.
One clear impediment to an overseas internal...
To continue reading
Request your trial