Employers Liable For Fraudulent Hiring

Author:Ms Susan Joffe
Profession:Holland & Knight LLP
 
FREE EXCERPT

In a tight job market marked by low unemployment, employers may be tempted to

exaggerate job benefits or make unrealistic promises to attract new hires. Such

impulses should be resisted, to avoid the risk of lawsuits based on a theory of

fraudulent inducement to hire. Should the employment relationship end badly,

unhappy former employees may sue on this theory if they feel they were hired

under false pretenses.

While the elements of this claim vary depending on state law, in general,

fraudulent inducement may be found if the employee can prove that the employer

made a significant misrepresentation concerning the job or the company; the

person making the statement knew or believed it was false at the time he or she

made it; the statement was made with the intent of deceiving the prospective

employee; and the prospective employee reasonably relied on the false statement

and suffered damages because of that reliance. For the most part, damages must

go beyond the loss of employment in order to state a claim.

Misrepresentations that have been found actionable include statements about

the financial stability of the company; promises of compensation, benefits and

support services that the company never intended to keep; and assurances of

long-term job security that the employer does not intend to honor. In fact,

claims have even been based on the failure to disclose harmful information, such

as corporate financial instability, when the applicant makes inquiries and the

employer's concealment is intended to persuade the employee to accept

employment.

In one New York case, a subsidiary of IBM was found liable for fraudulent

hiring when it lured two IBM employees away by falsely representing that the

subsidiary's financial security was assured by a long-term contract with IBM.

The court found that the employees stated a viable claim because their reliance

on the false assurances caused them to lose salary, vacation pay and pension

benefits they would have accrued had they not been persuaded to leave their old

jobs. In another New York case, a law firm was found to have fraudulently

induced an employee to leave her job by representing that she would lead the

firm's large environmental law practice when, in fact, it had no environmental

practice.

Penalties can be costly. If the misrepresentation is found to be deliberately

made for the purpose of luring the applicant, punitive damages may be imposed.

In California, a provision of the labor law makes it...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP