A Step Closer To Regulatory Clarity? OPR Transmits Draft CEQA Guidelines To Resources Agency
Lead agencies reviewing development project proposals under the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") continue to
struggle to reconcile the implications regarding the project's
impact on climate change with Assembly Bill 32's1
mandate to reduce California's greenhouse gas ("GHG")
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The absence of formal
guidance has left lead agencies and project proponents facing
significant risk and uncertainty, as they have attempted to analyze
hard-to-quantify impacts, link the project causally to the global
problem of climate change, and adopt defensible mitigation.
This state of uncertainty recently moved a grade closer to
regulatory clarity as the Office of Planning and Research
("OPR") released a new version of proposed amendments to
the CEQA Guidelines that is aimed at providing guidance on
addressing climate change impacts ("Draft GHG
Guidelines").2 While the draft amendments to
the Guidelines must still undergo a formal rulemaking procedure
with the Resources Agency, the release of the Draft GHG Guidelines
by OPR marks a significant advance.
Although an improvement on the prior draft released by OPR, the
Draft GHG Guidelines still do not provide clarity, as the language
is often vague and fails to address some of the most vexing
issues. Lead agencies and project proponents need to be aware
of these important developments and should consider taking part in
the public comment opportunities during 2009.
Statutory Background
The key legislation behind the Draft GHG Guidelines is Senate
Bill 97,3 passed in 2007, which identified climate
change as an environmental effect and officially brought it within
the purview of CEQA. SB 97 also tasked OPR with developing
guidelines for mitigating the impacts of GHG emissions subject to
CEQA review.4 Under the statute, OPR must transmit
proposed guidelines for mitigating GHG emissions to the Resources
Agency by July 1, 2009. It is this step that OPR recently
accomplished. The Resources Agency in turn must certify and
adopt the amendments by January 1, 2010.5 Over the
following months, the Resources Agency will conduct a formal
rulemaking, including additional opportunities for public comment
on the proposed Guidelines.
In a parallel process, OPR asked the California Air Resources
Board ("CARB") to recommend a method for setting
"thresholds of significance" within CEQA for GHG
emissions. One of CEQA's linchpins is a determination of
significance: the threshold below which...
To continue reading
Request your trial