Bribery Act Implementation Further Delayed

Author:Mr Iain Wright, Eric Kraeutler and Dana Becker
Profession:Morgan Lewis
 
FREE EXCERPT

On 31 January 2011, the United Kingdom Ministry of Justice confirmed a further delay in the implementation of the UK Bribery Act (the Act). The Act, which was scheduled to come into effect in April 2011, has been delayed pending the publication of guidance designed to enable business organisations to prepare for the new regime, particularly in relation to the procedures that organisations should adopt in the context of the new corporate offence of failure to prevent bribery. The Act is presently scheduled to come into effect three months after the guidance has been published. The Ministry of Justice has not announced when the final guidance can be expected.

This latest delay follows the UK government's July 2010 announcement that it was postponing the Act's implementation until April 2011 to allow businesses time to prepare for its effect. In September 2010, the Ministry of Justice issued draft guidance relating to the Act and initiated a two-month consultation period designed to elicit feedback from affected parties, with final guidance originally expected to be published in January 2011. The Act drew attention earlier this year when a UK government official suggested that the government would review the Act, leading to speculation that its anticipated effect on businesses would be tempered.

Since the Act's enactment, business organisations have criticized its potentially sweeping adverse effect and the uncertainty surrounding its interpretation. The Act, which seeks to broaden the UK's existing anti-bribery laws, establishes a strict liability corporate offence of failure to prevent bribery. This offence provides that a commercial organisation, which may include non-UK companies that conduct business in the UK, commits a criminal offence if a person associated with it engages in bribery with the intention of benefiting the organisation. The Act provides a potential defence for the organisation if it can demonstrate that it established "adequate...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP