Beware The Death Spiral Of 'Full Ratchet' Anti-Dilution
Today's uncertain economic environment, coupled with the
tightening of available capital from venture capital funds, has
marked the return of a dangerous price protection device:
"full ratchet" anti-dilution. This device, generally
included in the terms of preferred stock issued to new investors,
seeks to protect those investors from being diluted by a subsequent
financing at a lower valuation — the so-called "down
round" — by causing an adjustment to the applicable
conversion rate for the preferred stock.1
To understand how this works, here is an example that assumes a
company issued its Series A Preferred Stock at $5.00 per share.
These shares would ordinarily be convertible into common stock
upon an initial public offering (IPO) and certain other events on a
one-for-one basis — that is, upon conversion, the holder
would receive one share of common stock for each share of Series A
Preferred.
The full ratchet conversion formula, however, would provide that
if in the future, any additional shares of preferred stock or
common stock are issued at a lower price than the per-share price
paid for the Series A Preferred, then the conversion rate for the
Series A Preferred shares will be adjusted so that upon conversion,
the holders of Series A Preferred will receive as many shares of
common stock as if they had originally purchased Series A Preferred
shares at the same lower price paid for the subsequent
round, regardless of the size of the round relative to prior
financings.
For example, if in the next round the Series B Preferred was
issued at $2.50 per share, the full ratchet would cause the
conversion rate for the Series A Preferred shares to be adjusted
downward from the original $5.00 to $2.50 and the holders of Series
A Preferred would be entitled to convert each share of Series A
Preferred into two shares of common stock, whereas the
Series B Preferred holders would receive only one share of
common stock for each share of Series B Preferred. This provision
"protects" the Series A Preferred investors by making
sure that they will always get the benefit of the lower-priced
shares issued in later financing rounds.
What is the problem with this provision? The answer is simple.
From a practical standpoint, as seen in the example below, the
anti-dilution protection will result in additional shares being
issuable to the holders of Series A Preferred, which means that the
company will have to issue more shares to the new investors to get
them to the desired ownership percentage of the company. The
dilutive effect on the ownership percentages of the founders and
management can be severe and destabilizing for the company. As a
result, most investors would not want to come in as new investors
and put money in...
To continue reading
Request your trial