SEC Files Amicus Brief Urging Third Circuit to Reverse Troublesome Decision Limiting Rule 16b-3 Short-Swing Profit Exemption to Compensatory Transactions

Article from Goodwin Procter's Section 16 Committee

By Stephen W. Carr, P.C., Jeffrey C. Hadden, P.C., Laura C. Hodges Taylor, P.C. and James A. Matarese, P.C.

Michael S. Turner, Esq. contributed to the preparation of this article.

In the recent case of Levy v. Sterling Holding Company, LLC, 314 F.3d 106 (3d Cir. 2002), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals considered a claim that two large institutional holders were liable under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In reaching its decision, which resulted in $72 million in potential liability for the defendants, the court limited the exemption provided by the SEC's Rule 16b-3 to transactions having a compensatory element, such as awards of options under employee benefit plans. The court's decision is contrary to the position taken by the SEC when it revamped Rule 16b-3 in 1991 and came as a surprise to the SEC and practitioners alike. The consequences of the decision are potentially far-reaching. As discussed in more detail below, the SEC has filed an amicus curiae brief with the Third Circuit in which it urges the Court to rehear the matter and reverse its decision or grant en banc review of the decision.*

Section 16(b) applies to 10% owners of equity securities registered under Section 12 of the 1934 Act and to directors and officers of issuers of those securities. Section 16(b) permits issuers to recover so-called "short-swing" profits, that is, profits insiders realize from purchases and sales, or sales and purchases, of the issuer's securities within a period of less than six months. The SEC has authority to adopt exemptive rules and, pursuant to that authority, adopted Rule 16b-3, which as amended in 1991 expressly provides officers and directors an exemption from Section 16(b) liability for grants, awards or other acquisitions of securities from an issuer if the transaction is approved by the issuer's board of directors or shareholders.

The decision of the Third Circuit (which has jurisdiction over Section 16(b) suits involving Delaware corporations) is contrary to the commonly accepted reading of Rule 16b-3 and, as stated by the SEC in its brief, is inconsistent with the SEC's intention in adopting the rule. If the decision is not reversed, the implications are potentially broad - and unfortunate - for a great variety of transactions involving acquisitions of securities from an issuer.

The SEC's decision to file an amicus curiae brief with the Third Circuit is a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT