Commercial Aftershocks Of The Great Eastern Japan Earthquake: Force Majeure And Related Issues

The March 11, 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which the Japanese government formally named as the "Great Eastern Japan Earthquake" (Higashi Nihon Daishinsai) was undeniably a disaster of Biblical proportions. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the 9.0 magnitude earthquake is the fourth largest in the world since 1900 and the largest in Japan since modern instrumental recordings began 130 years ago. Tens of thousands of people were killed, a comparable number are still missing or injured, and many more have been displaced from their homes. The earthquake and tsunami wrought tremendous devastation, including serious damage to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station. According to some reports, the damage to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station has released enormous amounts of radiation, more than 100,000 times as much as was released in the Three Mile Island nuclear incident in 1979. The Japanese government recently raised the severity rating of the nuclear accident to a 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, the highest severity level possible and the rating shared by the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986.

The economic fallout from the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake is likely to continue for some time. Some have estimated that the total cost of recovery exceeds several hundred billion dollars, making it the most costly natural disaster ever. In addition to damage to factories, offices, and infrastructure caused by the earthquake and tsunami, the radiation risk has rendered some factories and offices unusable. Similarly, because of damage to Japan's electrical power capability in the affected region, other factories have had to shut down. A number of companies temporarily halted production in Japan in March. Even when production resumed, many factories had to operate at limited capacity because of parts shortages. Operation of factories at limited capacity will have ripple effects, even on companies that did not directly suffer damage from the Great Eastern Japanese Earthquake. Companies whose factories are operating at limited capacity will need fewer materials, parts, and components than they had anticipated needing before the earthquake. In turn, suppliers of those materials, parts, and components will want to reduce their purchases from their own suppliers. Additionally, business down the supply line, which require manufactured equipment or components from factories in the affected region, are not receiving the products or supplies they need to use in their operations or to complete products or projects for customers. The impact ultimately will extend all the way up and down the supply chain.

One inevitable consequence of the Great Eastern Japanese Earthquake will be the nonperformance, or partial performance, of various contractual obligations. With supply agreements, purchase orders, joint venture agreements, and many other contractual relationships, parties who would otherwise honor their contractual obligations may simply not be able to do so. Some may only be able to partially perform or there may be a delay in performance. Perhaps in the short term, most parties will focus on their recovery efforts rather than asserting claims. In the long term, however, the expectation is that disputes will arise between contracting parties as to who should bear the losses and damages resulting from non performance, partial performance, or delay in performance of contracts resulting from the Great Eastern Japanese Earthquake. Force majeure, and related concepts, will likely be central to resolution of such disputes.

General Force Majeure Principles

Force majeure is a legal principle, either provided for by contract or imposed on parties by law or courts, which excuses, or partially excuses, one or both parties to a contract from performing contractual obligations in certain specified circumstances. Usually, force majeure excuses a party from performance obligations or liability if some unforeseen or unanticipated event beyond the control of that party prevents it from performing its contractual obligations. Typically, force majeure covers "Acts of God" (such as fire, flood, earthquake, tsunami, storm, hurricane, or other natural disasters) or war, terrorism, or similar occurrences, and may also excuse performance based on the failure of third parties (such as suppliers and subcontractors) to perform their obligations to the contracting party (either generally or as a result of an Act of God or...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT