Walking The Tightrope Providing Actual Notice While Avoiding Declaratory Judgment
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2007)
Linked as:
Extract
Walking The Tightrope Providing Actual Notice While Avoiding Declaratory Judgment
Prior to instigating patent litigation, it historically has been viewed as beneficial to notify a potential infringer of infringement as early as possible. In addition to the business reasons associated with the offering of a license - i.e., the likelihood of a more efficient compromise, the mitigation of litigation costs, etc., the failure to provide actual notice to a potential infringer could serve to limit the time period involving, and hence the amount of, damag...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
This document cites
- US Code - Title 35: Patents - 35 USC 287 - Sec. 287. Limitation on damages and other remedies; marking and notice
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. Buckeye Steel Castings Company, Defendant-Appellant., 24 F.3d 178 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Samuel Gart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Logitech, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 254 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
