Transfer Pricing Of Intangibles
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2009)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2009)
Linked as:Extract
Transfer Pricing Of Intangibles
Article by Andreas Köster-Böckenförde and Alexa Clauss
I. Introduction The development, transfer, and licensing of intangibles are part and parcel of cross-border transactions among related parties. The allocation of costs and revenues, risks and chances, has a fundamental impact on the tax liability of multinational companies. Therefore, enterprises should pay special attention to transfer-pricing strategies, particularly with regard to intangible assets. But determining adequate transfer prices is extremely difficult. And the national fiscal authorities closely examine how companies deal with this matter, paying particular attention to whether they comply with the documentation rules. II. The Definition of "Intangible Property" When determining transfer prices, the first step is to identify the intangibles. Since there is no universal, abstract definition of "intangible assets" in German legislation or administration, the identification of intangibles often presents serious difficulties. The applicable rules and guidelines comprise only enumerations of intangibles.1 Under Section 266.II.A of the German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch), "intangibles" are identified as concessions, industrial property and similar rights, the licenses referring to such rights, goodwill, and advance payments. Section 5 of the 1983 Administrative Guidelines lists industrial property and similar rights, design protection rights, copyrights, business secrets, and other rights and benefits not legally protected.2 The 2005 Administrative Guidelines discuss the transfer of intangibles without defining the term at all.3 In several judgments, the Federal Tax Court defined "intangibles" as "incorporeal objects."4 Nevertheless, in most cases the Court merely gives examples (the right to supply, options, concessions,5 software6) without providing a more general or abstract definition. The literature tries to bridge this gap, holding that the lack of physical substance distinguishes intangible from tangible assets. Commentators further define "intangible assets" by explaining what they are not: neither material fixed assets nor financial assets.7 While financial assets obviously have no physical su...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Cair Mich Muslims to Condemn Al-Qaeda Involvement in Airline Attack | Saturday s Weather in Charleston | [ meetings... ] | Ronald Michalski, 67 | decisión nº 000904 de corte de apelaciones de amazonas, de may 06, 2009 | Decisión de Juzgado Superior Primero Civil, Mercantil, Transito, Trabajo y Protección del Adolescen de Tachira, de February 14, 2007 | Sentencia nº 4148 de Consiglio di Stato, July 30, 2008 | sentencia nº rc.000465 de tribunal supremo de justicia sala de casación civil de october 29 2010