Nuclear Medicine And The Stark Truth: What Are The Rules?
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2007)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2007)
Linked as:Extract
Nuclear Medicine And The Stark Truth: What Are The Rules?
Originally published in The Journal Of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 7, July 2007
For years, the Stark Law had little if anything to do with nuclear medicine. The federal prohibition against a physician's referral of a Medicare beneficiary to a health care entity with which that physician (or a member of his or her immediate family) had a financial relationship, unless an exception applied, had no relationship to nuclear imaging, because nuclear studies were not ''designated health services'' (DHS). Although the statutory Stark provisions defined DHS to include radiology as well as radiation therapy services and supplies, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) acted in January 2001 to issue the Phase I Stark II final regulations and declared that nuclear medicine was not a DHS.But in its 2006 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule, CMS revised the definit...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Letter From Spain | On Capitol Hill | Remembering Our Fallen | virus suspected in carp deaths | decisión de tribunal séptimo de primera instancia en funciones de control de lara extensión ... | Decisión nº PJ0152011000099 de Juzgado Vigesimo Cuarto de Municipio de Caracas, de March 28, 2011 | Decisión de Tribunal Segundo de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Juicio de Lara (Extensión Barquisimeto), de February 25, 2... | decisión nº s-n de tribunal segundo de primera instancia en funciones de ejecución de falcon ...