At Long Last! The Minnesota Supreme Court Speaks On Payment For Unused Vacation Upon Termination Of Employment
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2007)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2007)
Linked as:Extract
At Long Last! The Minnesota Supreme Court Speaks On Payment For Unused Vacation Upon Termination Of Employment
Minnesota employers have received a long-awaited decision from the state supreme court on a vacation pay issue that has caused much confusion and has divided employers and employees. In Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care Inc., issued on November 15, 2007, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that an employer's obligation to pay out unused vacation balances upon termination is governed by its policies and contracts. In Lee, a case in which Littler Mendelson represented the employer, the court ruled that the employer's policies lawfully denied an employee's claim for unused vacation benefits when the employee was terminated for misconduct, thereby reversing the 2006 decision of the Minnesota Court of A...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
United States of America, Appellee, v. Stelios Antonakopoulos, Defendant, Appellant., 399 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 2005) | in Re Citigroup Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan Litigation William Lomas on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated Plaintiffs Appellees v Travelers P... | Electric rate and corporate regulation combined filings, | endangered and threatened species: atlantic sturgeon; status review report, | sentencia nº 1624 de consiglio di stato march 31 2009 | Sentencia nº 3149 de Consiglio di Stato July 07 2010 | Sentencia nº 1552 de Consiglio di Stato, March 24, 2009 | Sentencia nº 350 de Consiglio di Stato, January 23, 2008