Delaware Court Interprets Continuing Director Poison Put Provision
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2009)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2009)
Linked as:Extract
Delaware Court Interprets Continuing Director Poison Put Provision
Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision,
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. AmylinPharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Amylin"),interpreting a "Continuing Director" clause contained ina change of control provision commonly found in many indentures andloan agreements. A continuing director provision typically eitherrequires the company to repurchase outstanding bonds or acceleratesa loan if the majority of the company's board of directorsceases to be composed of continuing directors.The Amylin decision interprets a typical formulation ofa continuing director provision that is often included in debtagreements, but is not generally heavily negotiated by the parties.The case addresses the implications for a board of directors whenconsidering these provisions in indentures and the impact of theseprovisions on the stockholder franchise. Set forth below are ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
looking back | Buckman Direct Diversion Project Planning Goes Full Stream Ahead | Pojoaque Middle School | Ncaa Tournament West Regional Glance | sentencia nº 1030 de consiglio di stato february 26 2008 | Sentencia nº 6672 de Consiglio di Stato December 17 2008 | Sentencia nº 3663 de Consiglio di Stato, July 29, 2010 | Resolución nº 24528, de Corte Suprema de Chile - Sala Cuarta, July 13, 2010