Delaware Court Interprets Continuing Director “Poison Put” Provision

Mondaq Business BriefingUnited States Law Articles in English (2009)

Linked as:

Extract


Delaware Court Interprets Continuing Director “Poison Put” Provision

Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision,

San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. Amylin

Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Amylin"),

interpreting a "Continuing Director" clause contained in

a change of control provision commonly found in many indentures and

loan agreements. A continuing director provision typically either

requires the company to repurchase outstanding bonds or accelerates

a loan if the majority of the company's board of directors

ceases to be composed of continuing directors.

The Amylin decision interprets a typical formulation of

a continuing director provision that is often included in debt

agreements, but is not generally heavily negotiated by the parties.

The case addresses the implications for a board of directors when

considering these provisions in indentures and the impact of these

provisions on the stockholder franchise. Set forth below are ...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company