'Hexion v. Huntsman': Delaware Court Reiterates High Bar To Finding An MAE; Provides Guidance On Requirements Of 'Reasonable Best Efforts'
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2008)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2008)
Linked as:Extract
'Hexion v. Huntsman': Delaware Court Reiterates High Bar To Finding An MAE; Provides Guidance On Requirements Of 'Reasonable Best Efforts'
On September 29, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its
opinion in the dispute between Hexion Specialty Chemicals andHuntsman over their $10.6 billion merger agreement. In sum, thecourt found that:despite a downturn in the business of Huntsman, no materialadverse effect (MAE) had occurred, andHexion had breached its obligations to use reasonable bestefforts to facilitate the merger and, because at least some ofthese breaches were "knowing and intentional," could beliable for damages in excess of a $325 million cap that mightotherwise apply.Accordingly, ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Josephine Pecht | Crime and Courts Vehicle Break-Ins Rattle Neighborhood | James J Ludwig | Bears Update | Sentencia de Cours d appel March 20 2002 caso Cour d appel de Lyon du 20 mars 2002 2000/07542 | arrêté du 24 novembre 1998 portant délégation de signature | Avis relatif aux jeux de loterie instantanée de La Française des jeux dénommés « Goal » « Morpion » et « Numé... | Sentencia de Cours d'appel, May 27, 2008 (caso Cour d'appel de Douai, 27 mai 2008, 08/00319)