D.C. Circuit Affirms FERC's Modifications To Northwestern's Regulation Service Rate

On March 16, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ("D.C. Circuit") affirmed FERC's (1) reduction in NorthWestern Corporation's ("NorthWestern") Schedule 3 regulation service rate by removing "regulation-down" capacity from the rate's numerator and increasing the denominator to the full nameplate capacity of NorthWestern's generating facility and (2) decision to order NorthWestern to refund customers the difference between NorthWestern's proposed rate and FERC's approved rate.

Prior to 2011, NorthWestern lacked the generating capacity to self-supply regulation service -generation that maintains the frequency of the transmission system by responding to variations in demand for electricity in real time. Instead, NorthWestern purchased regulation service from third parties and passed on the costs of these purchases to its customers. However, after constructing a new generating facility in 2011, NorthWestern filed revisions to its Schedule 3 rate to reflect that NorthWestern would recover the costs of self-supplying regulation service from the new generating facility, rather than passing on costs of purchasing regulation service from third parties as it had previously done. Specifically, NorthWestern proposed a cost-of-service rate, in which the numerator equaled the amount of capacity from the generating facility that NorthWestern allocated to its Schedule 3 customers (including "regulation-down" service) and the denominator equaled the amount of regulation service capacity NorthWestern planned to provide from the facility.

In affirming the Administrative Law Judge assigned to NorthWestern's filing, FERC lowered the cost-calculation ratio for NorthWestern's regulation service rate by (1) reducing the numerator to exclude megawatts associated with "regulation-down" capacity and (2) increasing the denominator to reflect the nameplate capacity of the generating facility. FERC also directed NorthWestern to refund its customers the difference between its proposed rate and the rate FERC approved.

NorthWestern petitioned the D.C. Circuit for review, arguing that, among other things, FERC should not have...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT