Bundled Discounts After 'Doe v. Abbot Labs'
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2009)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2009)
Linked as:Extract
Bundled Discounts After 'Doe v. Abbot Labs'
Originally published 10 December 2009
Keywords: Section 2, Sherman Act, bundling, Doe, Abbot, bundled discounts For the past several years, US courts have been struggling to articulate the limitations imposed by Section 2 of the Sherman Act on dominant firms seeking to engage in "bundling." Bundling typically involves providing customers a discount when they purchase products spanning several different product lines. The bundled discounts most frequently challenged under Section 2 are those where the bundle includes both "monopoly products," over which the dominant firm arguably wields monopoly power, and "competitive products," relative to which the dominant firm faces competition. The thrust of the antitrust challenge tends to focus on an allegation that the defendant is using its power in the monopoly market to attempt to monopolize the competitive market. Courts have reached drastically different conclusions on the legal standards applicable to this kind of conduct, which makes counseling in this area particularly difficult. The Ninth Circuit recently further complicated the analysis of bundled discounts by sug...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Research and Markets Vaginal Infections Therapy Area Pipeline Report. | school board meeting features fifth-grade choir news from school | Bulletin Board | sentenza nº 4058 de tribunali amministrativi regionali, campania, t.a.r. - campania - napoli, april ... | Sentencia de Cour de cassation, July 07, 1971 (caso Cour de Cassation, Chambre crimine... | Resolución nº 4789, de Corte Suprema de Chile - Sala Tercera, March 31, 2004 | Resolución nº 10929, de Corte Suprema de Chile - Sala Tercera, July 17, 2001