Absent Misrepresentation, a Party May Rely on a Favorable JMOL Determination and Jury Verdict as Objective Evidence That Its Infringement Claims Are Not Frivolous
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2010)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United States Law Articles in English (2010)
Linked as:Extract
Absent Misrepresentation, a Party May Rely on a Favorable JMOL Determination and Jury Verdict as Objective Evidence That Its Infringement Claims Are Not Frivolous
Judges: Newman, Lourie (concurring), Bryson (author) [Appealed from D. Colo., Judge Matsch]
In Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. BrainLAB Medizinische Computersysteme GmbH, Nos. 09-1058, -1059 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 26, 2010), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's grant of attorney fees against Medtronic Navigation, Inc. ("Medtronic") under 35 U.S.C. § 285 based on its continued efforts to pursue the case after an adverse claim construction decision, and alleged litigation misconduct. The Court also reversed the decision to hold Medtronic's counsel jointly liable for the attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and its inherent powers. In 1998, plaintiff Medtronic brought a patent inf...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
50 cfr 679.5 recordkeeping and reporting r& r . | 31 cfr 360.58 forms to be certified. | 27 CFR 31.58 - Hotels. | 8 CFR 1208.12 - Reliance on information compiled by other sources. | Sentencia nº 3697 de Consiglio di Stato, July 29, 2010 | Sentencia nº 2365 de Consiglio di Stato, May 26, 2010 | Sentencia nº 123 de Consiglio di Stato, April 15, 2010 | Sentencia nº 2240 de Consiglio di Stato, May 05, 2009